July 4, 2015, 5:28 pm
Search
 
» Home
» News
» Headline News
» Editorials
» Religion
» Articles
» Community
» Interviews
» Photo Gallery
» Youth Forum
» Business & Investments
» Sports Section
» Literature Corner
» Feed Back
» Guest Book
» Contact Us
» Letters to editors
» Archives
» Advertise with us

 

Quick Vote

After discrimination in Pakistan, do you support Christian to take asylum in other countries?

Yes; 
No; 
Do Not Know 


View Results
 

 

Special Features

Book Review By Yoginder Sikand : Hindutva and Dalits
Pakistani Christian leader needs your prayers and support
Pakistan Christian Congress presented Memorandum to EU
Send Concern letter to Prime Minister of Italia: On EHRC Ruling on Crucifixes
Separate Province and Division of Punjab: Asif Ali Zardari, Yousaf Raza Gillani and Nawaz Sharif Speak up Now!!!

Find Us At


Web Site of Siloam Biblical Christian Church of Pakistan

Suggested Sites

Geo News
Watch Ary news to get more updates!
Pakistan News
http://www.topwedding.com.au/

Letter To Editor

BJP should ask Vasundhara to file defamation case against Lalit Modi etc or resign and face prosecution

Hem Raj Jain
Dear Editor

Rajasthan Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje's involvement in Lalitgate (as reported in media Tuesday evening that in August, 2011 Raje backed Lalit Modi’s UK immigration application on the condition that her support was not made known to the Indian Authorities) legally requires prosecution of Vasundhara for helping and abetting fugitive from law and that too when Vasundhara was Leader of Opposition in Rajasthan (with Cabinet rank).

But on June 19, 2015 the defense provided by her party BJP (that this document is not authenticated / verified) is untenable. This document was put in public domain by Advocate Mehmood Abdi of Lalit Modi (and his PR team). Whenever an Advocate presents any document he / she always have access to original. Therefore it is the responsibility of Advocate Abdi to provide originals (or its certified true copies) whenever demanded by authorities.

Investigating officer of Rajasthan govt. could have easily got original of these documents from Advocate Abdi but Vasundhara will not do it. Hence BJP (the party with difference) should ask Vasundhara to either file criminal defamation case against Lalit Modi, his Advocate Abdi and his PR Team (if she claims there are no such documents) or else resign from Chief Minister-ship of Rajasthan and face the criminal prosecution..

Regards

Hem Raj Jain

(Author of 'Betrayal of Americanism')

Can ‘India Christian Post’ be launched?

Hem Raj Jain
To

Owner / Management

Pakistan Christian Post (PCP)

Is it possible for your ‘Christian Post’ to launch ‘India Christian Post’ (ICP)?

It is evident from following letter which I sent yesterday to Editor PCP, - in India there is no media which properly covers the issues of public interest and if ICP functions in India many public interest issues (as happened in Gujjar agitation) will be addressed satisfactorily.

Moreover if ICP is launched in India it will go a long way in serving the interest of not only Christianity in India but also of Indian Christians (who like Christians in Pakistan are, as religious minority, harassed by Hindu communal elements frequently).

It is needless to say that the Christianity which is known for its pro-human rights views, principles & policies will ultimately benefit ~ 1.25 Billion Indians through ICP

If you want I can contact some Christian leaders (socio - religious) or any other in Bengaluru (or even in India) to explore the possibilities, potential and need of ICP in India.

Regards

Hem Raj Jain

(Author of 'Betrayal of Americanism')

Bengaluru, (Karnataka) India

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;



Dear Editor

Pakistan Christian Post

8 days long Gujjar agitation (which was causing immense problems & inconvenience to people because Delhi - Mumbai rail route and Highways were blocked by agitators) has been called-off on May 28, 2015 following assurance by Rajasthan Government that it will bring a fresh bill to accord 5% job reservation to Gujjars.

Last time in 2008 when Gujjars blocked railway route at the same place Pilukapura (from May, 23 to June 17, 2008) nobody bothered to remove them but this time due to coverage of this agitation by ‘Pakistan Christian Post’ (PCP) http://pakistanchristianpost.com/letterdetails.php?letterid=696 (the copy of which was sent to President, Lok Sabha Speaker, Supreme Court, NHRC, Prime Minister, Home Minister, Railway Minister, Rajasthan High Court, Delhi Police, Rajasthan Govt & Police etc) not only (i)- Delhi Police registered the case Ref. No.- 8247/E-mail dated 25/05/2015 at Special Commissioner of Police / CRIME, where if railway services had not started the railway authorities would have been booked under criminal law by Delhi Police but also (ii)- Rajasthan High Court too (which did nothing in 2008) pressurized Rajasthan Government & Police to restore rail and road traffic.

Due to this pressure on Gujjars (of getting removed by force by Government) they entered into a half-cooked agreement in haste with Rajasthan Government. In Rajasthan the Gujjars had a towering leader Late Sh. Rajesh Pilot whom Gujjars trusted. After his death his son former Member of Parliament & Union Minister Sachin Pilot is still in politics. Hence Sachin is under moral obligation to enlighten Indians especially Gujjars of Rajasthan about the real position of this deal in view of given below:-

(1)- There is nothing wrong in giving reservation in government services [and not in elections and education (to protect merit)] if some communities think they will otherwise not get justified representation in government services. But it should never be given in the name of oppressed (Dalits) or backwards because it demoralizes the beneficiaries which is anti-democratic. Because in monarchies government run the people but in democracy people run the governments hence their moral should be more than of the governments. Because Hindu majority India has majority of population in these reserved categories who consider themselves as depressed and backward (hence demoralized) , this is the main reason India has not progressed to the extent it could / should have.

(2)- Hindu majority India by deceit has given reservation to even those castes of Hindus in the name of backwards (like Jats, Yadavs etc which once even ruled at Mathura, Bharatpur etc) but denied reservation to Muslims and Christians. Therefore entire reservation laws could have been challenged in Court under Article 13 & 14 of the Constitution (by Gujjars etc from Hindus and Christians & Muslims) and then government could have made new reservation law where any community (which wants reservation) may be given reservation in government services as per its %-age in population. But Gujjjars preferred to go alone.

(3)- Historically there has been rivalry (even gory at times) between ‘Meena’ and ‘Gujjar’ communities in Rajasthan. Their socio - economic condition is more or less same. Meena are getting reservation in ‘Schedule Tribe’ (ST) category which gives maximum advantage (in education, government services, elections to Local-bodies Legislative Assemblies, Parliament etc) as compared to reservation in various categories of Backward (which Gujjars had). This empowered Meenas so much that it disadvantaged Gujjars immensely in their age-old rivalry.

(4)- Therefore in 2007- 8 agitation Gujjars demanded that they too, like Meenas, should be given reservation in ST category. Anybody who knows anything about Rajasthan knows that Meenas do not deserve ST status because many Meenas are having tens of acres of irrigated land with agricultural implements like tractors etc. (including in Kota division with canals from Chambal river dam) But Gujjar leaders either goofed or conspired (against gullible Gujjar community) when they did not press for survey of Meenas too (as was done for Gujjars by Chopra Committee which Rajasthan government constituted after Gujjar agitation to know whether Gujjars deserve ST Status and which Chopra Committee naturally declined).

(5)- After 2008 agitation Gujjars, for the reasons best know to them only, scaled down their demand and have been agitating for 5% reservation in Special Backward Class (SBC) Status which takes total reservation to 54 % in Rajasthan. Because Supreme Court of India (SCI) has put a limit of 50 % to all the reservations, Gujjars were getting only 1% reservation in SBC category.

(6)- Now on May 28, 2015 what Rajasthan Government has assured is a bill which will allow 5% reservation to Gujjar in SBC category and in order to take care of the objections of SCI the Rajasthan Govt. will request Union Govt to put this bill in IX Schedule of the Constitution where Bills repugnant to even fundamental rights, court decree / directions etc can be put.

(7)- But here there are two problems (i)- Any constitutional amendment will need required majority in Parliament which incumbent Union Govt does not have and other political parties (including allies) may not cooperate with incumbent BJP in this matter (because of its fall-out in other States). Hence Gujjars may face this problem (ii)- The SCI has been taking objection about putting bills in IX schedule which SCI can still do especially given the fact that many other States will do the same and which will culminate into huge political turmoil in India. Hence Gujjars may face this problem too.

Therefore Sachin Pilot should clarify to the people especially to Gujjars of Rajasthan the above mentioned issues otherwise people of Rajasthan may soon have to face another Gujjar agitation with half-cooked remedies sought by Gujjars and thus perpetually creating problems and inconveniences, by Railway and Highway blockade, to tens of millions of people of India.

Regards

Hem Raj Jain

(Author of 'Betrayal of Americanism')

Bengaluru, (Karnataka) India

Natural Law

Roberto Grao
It is a commonly accepted fact, not only in moral philosophy but also in everyday life, that all human beings, when have full use of reasoning, possess an inner voice that informs them about good and evil, truth and lie, justice and injustice of human acts. This is what we call consciousness which not only informs us but also through the consideration of these acts, censures or approves them in an independent way.

The question is: what is conscience based to inform us about the goodness or evil of these human acts? I think that it is based on three factors: reason, faith in God and knowledge of the nature of things that person perceives in the world. With the reason it reflects and judges on the facts, with faith it perceives them with greater clarity and with the knowledge of the nature of things it shows its objective characteristics, challenging us to discover and know them deeply.

The natural law or natural moral law is the objective discovery of this nature of things done fairly by the person and its subsequent recognition For example, we discover the natural law when we say that people should not take over the property of others (steal) or deprive them of life (kill), or maltreat them (violence), or deceive them (lie), or abuse a minor (child sexual abuse) or have sex with another man's wife (adultery), etc.

But we have to consider the role that the will plays in human beings which have the last word in their decisions. In effect, people may reject the faith and even the natural law (the voice of God in the heart of man) to take a subjective stance that takes them to satisfy their ambitions of power, money, domain, influences and wealth or simply for convenience or cowardice. In this case the reason is the exclusive service of the selfish attitude and tries to justify it with fallacious reasoning, imposing its own servitude to human consciousness.

This is what is happening. Since old times until nowadays, many people have chosen to reject the faith in God and the natural law to follow the dictation of willingness inclined to the ego and the power over people. With this attitude they have caused countless harms and injustices to their fellow men with greater or lesser cruelty and intensity (I will not mention names) as the concentration and extermination camps or induced abortion. These people are those who mock or blaspheme against the Church, Jesus Christ and the faith of believers. They insult, despise, and hate God and call riffraff those who do not think like them. Isn't it true that the blasphemy in some circles of coexistence is a common symptom of "manhood" and hateful arrogance? Or does the mockery against the Church is the cause of revelry? What a Pity!

These words do not intend to be negative, but help to discover the origin of evil that exists in the world from the beginning (the rejection of God, faith and natural law) in order to make that some people think and decide to choose radically God (the good). They must do it with greater determination and intensity and must fight hard against the evil so we can reduce it.

Roberto Grao

Independent Forum of Opinion (Spain)

Harassing Yasin Malik wouldn't serve purpose, only retrieve of POK will do

Hem Raj Jain
Dear Editor

Indian media has started asking for blood of JKLF Chairman Yasin Malik because during his press conference he suggest that UJC chief Syed Sallah-ud-din should form a probe committee so that facts over Sopore incident could come to fore after thorough investigations.

During this press conference Malik reportedly also said that PDP-BJP government in J&K has imposed an overall ban on all peaceful, pro-freedom activities. He remarked further that on May 25, 2015 when JKLF tried to start a peaceful ‘Safr-e- Jehd-e-Musalsal’, not only he was arrested along with the front cadre but also terror was unleashed in entire Pulwama district hence it has been resolved that choking political space is not acceptable to JKLF and would fight this undemocratic behavior of so called rulers at every level and for this JKLF will start Jail Bharo Tehreek for ten 10 days from Friday May 29, 2015 and after that if the situation remains unchanged then the future course of action shall be announced by JKLF.

There is nothing wrong in these statements of Malik. God only knows when will Government of J&K (GOJ&K) and Government of India (GOI) understand that there is a difference between non-violent freedom of expression and actual acts of violence / armed rebellion as explained at http://www.pakistanchristianpost.com/viewarticles.php?editorialid=2398.

So far government has not released Masarrat Alam who has been put in jail because he was involved in raising Pakistani flags and slogans. Even Home Minister of GOI Rajnath Singh absurdly said in Jammu on Wednesday that people raising flags & slogans of Pakistan will not be tolerated which means separatists like Geelani, Mirwaiz etc may also soon be likewise sent to jail..

These reactions (of GOJ&K, GOI, media, political & strategic commentators and others in India) would have been O.K. had it been some normal State of India but J&K is not so as given below:-

(1)- If India does not consider POK as India (hence does not want to retrieve it) then why people of J&K (especially Kashmiri separatists like Geelani, Masarat Alam, Yasin Malik, Mirwaiz etc) should consider themselves as Indian citizens. ‘1947 Instrument of Accession of J&K to India’ did not merely bring extra territory to India but also casts responsibility on India to protect territorial integrity of J&K. Hence if India does not retrieve POK then as per law India will be considered in forceful-illegal-possession of Indian side of J&K.

(2)- Is the said political fraud by Indian State (where it does not want to retrieve POK) the main reason PM Modi did not agitate the issue of ‘China-Pakistan Economic Corridor’ during his visit to China as mentioned at http://www.pakistanchristianpost.com/viewarticles.php?editorialid=2392

(3)- Are Kashmiri Muslim politicians (Abdullahs etc of NC, Muftis etc of PDP, Lone etc of JKPC and others) aware of this political fraud of Indian State ? If yes, then it will be as bad as stabbing people of J&K (especially Kashmiri Muslims) in their back by these Kashmiri Muslim politicians. Because Kashmiri Muslims are the main victims of excesses - the result of deployment of hundreds of thousand of military and paramilitary forces along with AFSPA etc in J&K. If GOI does not want POK then Kashmir solution will be much easier (at least from Indo-Pak government side) and such huge deployment of security forces in the civilian life of the people of J&K will not be necessary

(4)- Has GOI ever thought that even if GOI forgets POK, Islamic Jihadis from Pakistan (including UJC chief Syed Sallah-ud-din) which, as per media reports, laid down the lives of ~ one hundred thousand Jihadis (from Pakistan, J&K, Afghanistan etc) for Kashmir will not forget Kashmir.

Therefore instead of harassing its own citizens ( like Geelani, Masarat Alam, Yasin Malik, Mirwaiz etc) India should retrieve POK without any further delay and for this should move UN & P5+1 to bring Pak nukes under UN control as explained at http://www.pakistanchristianpost.com/letterdetails.php?letterid=694

Once India is seen retrieving POK, the behavior of separatists like Geelani, Masarrat Alam, Yasin Malik, Mirwaiz etc and of others in J&K will change to the satisfaction of Indian State.

Regards

Hem Raj Jain

(Author of 'Betrayal of Americanism'

Crimes of constitutional authorities of government of Rajasthan and government of India are being condoned

Hem Raj Jain
Dear Sir / Madam

It is a matter of shame for the concerned authorities of government of Rajasthan and government of India (who are responsible for running train on Delhi - Mumbai railway route and for maintaining law & order in Rajasthan and for ensuring that Rajasthan government functions as per constitution) that the railway services on this Delhi-Mumbai route (at Pilukapura, Bharatpur) has not been restored so far causing problem and inconvenience to tens of millions of Indians and which is nothing short of anarchy born out of chronic martial deficiency of Indian State

Even President of India, Prime Minister, Lokasabha Speaker and NHRC are condoning the crimes of these constitutional authorities of government of Rajasthan and government of India as explained at http://www.pakistanchristianpost.com/headlinenewsd.php?hnewsid=5359

Regards

Hem Raj Jain

(Author of 'Betrayal of Americanism')

Bengaluru, (Karnataka) India


Trial of Pakistani Christian Nation By Nazir S Bhatti

Click Here
On demand of our readers, I have decided to release E-Book version of "Trial of Pakistani Christian Nation" on website of PCP which can also be viewed on website of Pakistan Christian Congress www.pakistanchristiancongress.org You can read chapter wise by clicking tab on left handside of PDF format of E-Book.
You can send your comments on
E-Mails nazirbhattipcc@aol.com
pakistanchristianpost@comcast.net
 

GET PAKISTAN CHRISTIAN POST AT YOUR HOME NOW



Amazingbible.org 5000
pages of Bible News,
Prophecy and Studies


Letter To Editor

BJP should ask Vasundhara to file defamation case against Lalit Modi etc or resign and face prosecution
Can ‘India Christian Post’ be launched?
Natural Law
Harassing Yasin Malik wouldn't serve purpose, only retrieve of POK will do
Crimes of constitutional authorities of government of Rajasthan and government of India are being condoned
 
 
© 2008 Copy Rights Pakistan Christian Post. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by PakCyber.