Though a former Judge of top court the Supreme Court of India (SCI) may be trying to give an impression that all is well and there is no confrontation between the SCI and the Government of India (GoI) led by Hindutva forces (as reported at https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/no-judical-overreach-ex-supreme-court-judge-on-jagdeep-dhankhars-remarks-8204440 ) but it is only a matter of time [if the SCI protects the majesty of law and of the apex court (which has plenary powers under Article 141, 142 and 144 of the Constitution and has inherent power under Under Article 129 of the Constitution to punish for its contempt ) also through the CCA 1971 , The Contempt of Courts ACt 1971] that criminal contempt proceeding are started by the SCI against Vice President Jagdeep Dhankad and BJP Member of Parliament Nishikant Dubey  as explained below:-

(1)- If agrieved by Court order then instead of getting moved the Court through Review petition the Vice President Dhankad has called the SCI (which exercizeed its power under Article 142 of the Constitution) a nuclear Missile 24x7 (as reported at https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2025/Apr/17/nuclear-missile-against-democratic-forces-vp-dhankar-slams-sc-deadline-for-president-to-decide-on-bills) which is clearly criminal contempt ( as defined in section 2 (c ) of the CCA 1971) of the SCI by V.P. Dhankad who once said that he is Eklavya of the RSS https://inshorts.com/en/news/i-became-eklavya-of-rss-25-yrs-ago--says-vp-in-rs--jp-nadda-smiles-1720027002262 )

(2)- The BJP Member of Parliament Nishikant Dubey has said that the SCI is responsible for inciting religious war in India (as reported at https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/India/supreme-court-responsible-for-inciting-religious-wars-bjp-mp-nishikant-dubey/ar-AA1DerbF?ocid=BingNewsSerp )  which is clearly criminal contempt ( as defined in section 2 (c ) of the CCA 1971) of the SCI by BJP M.P. Nishikant Dubey. 

Moreover the way the SCI issued interim order on April, 17 (in the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the WAA) regarding  two most important   provision of the WAqf Amended Act (WAA) namely  Waqf by user properties and  new appointments (especially of non-Muslim) in Waqf Boards and council ) one should not be surprised rather it is highly likely that when hearing resumes on and after May 5 the SCI is highly likely to  put stay on entire WAA or to quash the entire WAA under Article 13 of the constitution by saying that it is inconsistent with and derogatory of the fundamental rights.  

In such situation Modi government may do what former PM Rajiv Gandhi did in  Shah Bano case https://www.opindia.com/2020/08/shah-bano-case-rajiv-gandhi-surrender-muslim-hardliners-supreme-court-order-overturn/#google_vignette . PM Modi may bring a Presidential ordinance to restore / implement the WAA and then can easily get it approved by parliament under Article 123 of the Constitution. But it doesn't stop the SCI again from quashing it under Article 13 of the Constitution (because this time aggrieved Muslims would move the court) and of course it will not stop the GoI to get another similar Presidential ordinance and its approval by Parliament.

But such reciprocal repeated exercise by the SCI (of quashing the WAA under Article 13 of the constitution ) and by the GoI (of getting Presidential ordinance & its Parliamentary approval)  can’t go-on ad-infinitum  because it will create massive demonstrations and political unrest  across India and naturally it will constrain the Modi government to impose emergency in India under Article 352 of the Constitution as former PM Indira Gandhi did in 1975. 

During such emergency once law & Order is restored by the GoI in India also by replacing the CJI and filling the SCI with pro-government judges the Modi government can go for election of Parliament on two issues [which is bound to bring much more than two third majority (necessary for constitutional amendments) to PM Modi in Parliament of Hindu majority India which is presently under immense influence of Hindutva ideolgy) of  bringing constitutional amendments (i)- To make India a ‘Hindu Rashtra’ (Theocratic Hindu nation) which is the dream of the Hindutva forces (guided by the RSS and led by PM Modi) the ideological children of Savarkar who first propounded in 1923  the ‘two nation theory’ (in his book “the Hingutva” https://www.newsclick.in/Savarkar-Hindutva-Two-Nation-Theory )  which was exploited by Jinnah & Muslim League and which Gandhi, Nehru and Patel succumbed to for partitioning India on the basis of religion (ii)- To expel all the Muslims from India who as per PM Modi are illegal immigrants (the ‘Ghuspethiye) as reported at https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/modi-accused-of-hate-speech-for-calling-muslims-infiltrators-at-indian-election-rally especially when 20% Hindus after partition  have bee expelled from each of Pakistan (from about 22 % to about 2 %)  and Bangladesh (from about 28 % to about 8 %) whereas Muslim population increased in India after partition (from about 13 to 15 %) . 

This will ofcourse create immense political disturbances in entire South Asia (especially in Muslim majority  countries of Asia and in all the Muslim countries of the world)  which would be a matter of grave concern for the friend of India and for the leader of the free world the USA.

Therefore Prez Trump ought to keep a watch because there may be an emergency and ‘Hindu Rashtra’ in India if present face-off between SCI & Government of the world’s largest secular democracy India  continues”.